Post by rayancaleb on Feb 2, 2018 3:09:16 GMT -5
Hi,
The author does point out that Apple not including a free subscription is a problem, and I understand that point but I think the numbers of paid users is more important in this situation and the growth of paid users with each service would better reflect whether they actually got into streaming too late.
My question is then why is the article titled the way it is, when there isn't data used to reflect that (slow growth would, but there hasn't been data on the growth yet) would seem more logical to me to title it differently?
Please help.
Thanks!
I didn't find the right solution from the Internet.
References:
www.theverge.com/2015/12/5/9853536/question-about-mica-singletons-about-apple-getting-into-streaming-late
AntiVirus video
The author does point out that Apple not including a free subscription is a problem, and I understand that point but I think the numbers of paid users is more important in this situation and the growth of paid users with each service would better reflect whether they actually got into streaming too late.
My question is then why is the article titled the way it is, when there isn't data used to reflect that (slow growth would, but there hasn't been data on the growth yet) would seem more logical to me to title it differently?
Please help.
Thanks!
I didn't find the right solution from the Internet.
References:
www.theverge.com/2015/12/5/9853536/question-about-mica-singletons-about-apple-getting-into-streaming-late
AntiVirus video